Epstein Secrets

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck,

nary, hazards of incrimination." United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). Accordingly, response

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck,

o Plaintiffs discovery requests. United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). The Fifth Amendment s

[email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] William J. Berger

minal nature, such as threats of liability in civil suits.’” United States v. Conces, 507 F.3d 1028, 1040 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 125 (1980)). It is Epstein’s burden to “demonstrate a real danger of incrimination if he were to respond to any particular discover

nsel for Plaint/ff in Related Case No. 08-08804 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck,

o Plaintiffs discovery requests. United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). The Fifth Amendment

Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counsel for Plaint/ff in Related Case No. 08-80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 14 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 3

he claimant must [also] be 'confronted by substantial and 'real,' and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination." United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). Accordingly, responses to the requests propounded upon Epstein would provide information which is protected by the privi

Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 rjosefsb

sult in criminal prosecution. See generally Hoffman v United States, 341 U.S. at 486; United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 36 and United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. at 128. The Court's order seems to hone in on the "required records" exception for the proposition that, as a matter of law, Epstein's pe

Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 488 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2010 Page 12 of 12 Page No. 12 Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Or

sult in criminal prosecution. See generally Hoffman v United States, 341 U.S. at 486; United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 36 and United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. at 128. The Court's order seems to piggyback on DE 462 (a similar order), and thus seems to hone in on the "required records" exception f

enue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 rjosefsb

antial and 'real,' and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazard[] of incrimination" when it comes to Plaintiffs discovery requests. United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). (i) The Fifth Amendment and Plaintiffs' Rule 4 Appeal The Fifth Amendment serves as a guarantee against testimonial com

e 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counselfor·Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- , 80469 • Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 riosefab

sult in criminal prosecution. See generally Hoffman v United States, 341 U.S. at 486; United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 36 and United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. at 128. The Court's order seems to hone in on the "required records" exception for the proposition that, as a matter of law, Epstein's pe

ndant Jetty Estein Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. 'a Law Firm P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Poditurst Orseck, P.A. Counsel for Plaintiffs in netatea Lase 24 EFTA00222465

sult in criminal prosecution. See generally Hoffman v United States, 341 U.S. at 486; United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 36 and United States v, Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. at 128. The Court's order seems to hone in on the "required records" exception for the proposition that, as a matter of law, Epstein's pe