Epstein Secrets

ased on her investigation which included her review 23 more important evidence to her, which was her review of 24 of materials provided to her by Defense Counsel 24 the MySpace pages of certain of your witnesses, she did .25 Professor Alan Dersb3witr2 25 . communicate to you, the case agent, ha belief th

tirt & P.A. 1820513ismne Boulevard B.B. Susie 2218 4 Plaintiff Miami, Phone S 1, 6 ws- VOLUME al OF IV 7 8 Oa behalf of the Plaintiff, Jame Doe No. IL ISIDRO MAKIJEI. GARCIA, ESQUIRE GARCIA, MAINS& BOO-RINGER 9 224 Dan Awnuo Suite 90) West 33401 Dcfaxlinta. 10 tilde Phan( 9 11 in

tein would ask them to take off all 23 BY MR. WEINBERG: • 23 thek clothes, and they would take off as much clothes 24 • Q. Page 9 on So Ms. Jane Doe 4's 24 as they felt comfortable with and we re not forced to 25 . aaffidavit. date of birth is and she was 18 at the time of 25 take off

m what they did with the 14 $200 they received? 15 A. I might have. I can't recall at this time if 16 I did or didn't. 17 Q. Did you ever ask lane Doe 103 — strike that. 18 • • Jane Doe I.03 told you that she had received a 19 significant amount of money because she said she bad 20 • gone to

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely_Advised That the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

tner in the former firm of Herman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely Advised Tbat the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

partner in the former firm of Herman, Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for S50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doc # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely Advised That the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

er in the former firm of Herman, , & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely Advised That the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

partner in the former firm of Herman, Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely Advised That the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

the formcr firm of Herman, Sloman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. 'effigy Epstein" despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Federa

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely Advised That the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

9. who is the named partner in the former firm of filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely Advised That the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

39. who is the named partner in the former firm of filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each awsut is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein," despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

uke University Johns Hopkins University Judicial Studies Program (California Judges) Michigan Judicial Institute (Michigan Judges) Texas Assn. of Defense Counsel, San Francisco All-Star Seminar, Atlanta Bar, Atlanta US Census Bureau, Washington, DC Annenberg School of Communication Women and Memory, Unive

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu

turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the age of majority, and, in fact, no guardian was necessary to represent their interests. Defense Counsel was Falsely Advised That the Non Prosecution Agreement Would Be Kept Confidential. 20. On September 24, Epstein and the USAO executed a Non Prosec

ed to include Jane Doe #2 among the list of Epstein's victims. Ironically, these same attempts to protect Jane Doe #2's rights are now being used by Jane Doe #2 to allege violations of the CVRA. Petitioners also allege that the letters sent to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 during the period when Epstein wa