Epstein Secrets

cted Epstein when she received the letter and subpoena; Epstein put her in touch with his attorney, Jack Goldberger; and Goldberger had his friend, Jim Eisenberg, serve as Individual #28's lawyer while Epstein paid Eisenberg's fees. Individual #28 later told Brad Edwards that someone (Epstein, Goldberger, or

out of the auditorium to I more private area because I did not think it was I conversation meant for public consumption but they would not move. As the PSC Coordinator, I had overseen the invitations 13 For example, Epstein claimed that the massages were legitimate "medical" massages, so I wanted to see if he was

ctims with notice of state change of plea hearing. 13-20 19/11/2007 Email from Marie Villafana toJeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with Jim Eisenberg 13.21 12/21/2007 Letter from Jay Lefkowitz to Alex Acosta re wanting to sec victim list B.22 12/26/2007 Letter from Jay Lelkowitz. to Alex Acost

25498 the auditorium to a more private area because I did not think it was a conversation meant for public consumption but they would not move. As the PSC Coordinator, I had overseen the invitations for the law enforcement representatives from the S.D. Fla., and Mr. Krischer had not been on the list. So I now won

send. (Exhibit B-14). At 5:08 pm, I received an email from Jeff Sloman that said, "Hold the letter" (Exhibit B-54). On December 10 007, I contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe I United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for

uding in the non-prosecution agreement a provision incorporating 18 U.S.C. § 2255. As noted above, I became familiar with § 2255 through my work as the PSC Coordinator. I also was aware, as set forth in the victim notification letters that I prepared, that, under the CVRA, I was obligated to use my "best efforts"