Epstein Secrets

cted Epstein when she received the letter and subpoena; Epstein put her in touch with his attorney, Jack Goldberger; and Goldberger had his friend, Jim Eisenberg, serve as Individual #28's lawyer while Epstein paid Eisenberg's fees. Individual #28 later told Brad Edwards that someone (Epstein, Goldberger, or

ients, and he sued Epstein on behalf of I number of victims under the NPA. I did what I could to assist Mr. Edwards, other attorneys, including Mr. Josefsberg, the attorney selected by the Special Master, and the Court, to locate victims, provide signed copies of the NPA, and answer questions. After all of

chool more than fifteen years before, and had not been roommates. Ironically, one of the reasons why Epstein's legal team approved the selection of Robert Josefsberg was that Josefsberg and Alan Dershowitz were law school classmates - somehow there was no "financial interest" attributed to them. Page 28 of 58 E

rs before, and had not been roommates. Ironically, one of the reasons why Epstein's legal team approved the selection of Robert Josefsberg was that Josefsberg and Alan Dershowitz were law school classmates - somehow there was no "financial interest" attributed to them. Page 28 of 58 EFTA00225071 Rather

ctims with notice of state change of plea hearing. 13-20 19/11/2007 Email from Marie Villafana toJeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with Jim Eisenberg 13.21 12/21/2007 Letter from Jay Lefkowitz to Alex Acosta re wanting to sec victim list B.22 12/26/2007 Letter from Jay Lelkowitz. to Alex Acost

1 Contains 6(e) Material EFTA00225475 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 6/15/2009 Villafalia Lefkowitz Letter re Josefsberg's fees 6/16/2009 Villafafia Ka Katherine Ell W. Email with attachment 6/17/2009 Lefkowitz Villafafia Letter in response to Lefkowitis 6/15/09

chool more than fifteen years before, and had not been roommates. Ironically, one of the reasons why Epstein's legal team approved the selection of Robert Josefsberg was that Josefsberg and Alan Dershowitz were law school classmates — somehow there was no "financial interest" attributed to them. Page 28 of 58 E

rs before, and had not been roommates. Ironically, one of the reasons why Epstein's legal team approved the selection of Robert Josefsberg was that Josefsberg and Alan Dershowitz were law school classmates — somehow there was no "financial interest" attributed to them. Page 28 of 58 EFTA00225510 Rather

ruary 02, 2009 9:58 AM To: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Hi Brad — Sony. I have been out of town. Have you asked Ms. former attorney (Jim Eisenberg)? We gave him a copy of the DVD. And I know that Epstein's lawyers have a copy because one of them mentioned reviewing it. It just may be faster be

USAFLS) To: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG; KATHERINE W. EZELL; Brad Edwards < >; Cc: Sent: Mon Dec 29 17:16:03 2008 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs. Josefsberg, Edwards, Scarola, Herman, Kuvin, Dutko, and Willits and Ms. Ezell: Ms. Ezell contacted me to inquire whether Mr. Epstein will be told of the names

he videotaped version, I would appreciate it. If not, no big deal. Thanks Brad EFTA00216111 From: Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:42 AM To: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG: KATHERINE W. EZELL: Brad Edwards: Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Not exactly. Mr. Epstein is only supposed to go directly from jail to work and

Child Exploration Statutes in Tide 18 10/19/2006 Subpoena to Individual #28 (return date 10/27/06) 10/24/2006 Email chain between Villafafia and Jim Eisenberg discussing Individual #28 1) 10/30/2006 Villafatia Guy Lewis Email re representation of Jeffrey Epstein I 10/31/2006 Villafaria Guy Lewis Em

1 Contains 6(e) Material EFTA00224990 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 6/15/2009 Villafaila Lefkowitz Letter re Josefsberg's fees 6/16/2009 Villafaila Katherine W. Ezell Email with attachment 6/17/2009 Lefkowitz Villafaila Letter in response to Lefkowitz's 6/15/0

send. (Exhibit B-14). At 5:08 pm, I received an email from Jeff Sloman that said, "Hold the letter" (Exhibit B-54). On December 10 007, I contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe I United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for

da Bar that the Victim Notification Letters violated the Florida Bar rules against solicitation. He had filed complaints against myself and against Robert Josefsberg — the attorney-representative selected by the Special Master. On September 18, 2008, I wrote to the Florida Bar asking for an Ethics opinion (Exhib