Epstein Secrets

licious prosecution or abuse of process; 19 rather, it would be through the court with 20 contempt proceedings, perhaps. It would be 21 through the Florida Bar for, you know, 22 inappropriate actions taken by an attorney. It 23 could be perjury for a litigant which would be 24 handled by the state. 25

is the decision in -- bear 20 with me, Judge. 21 THE COURT: No problem. 22 MR. KING: That is the decision in Johnson 23 vs. Libow, a 2012 -- Westlaw 4068409 in 2012. 24 THE COURT: Okay. 25 MR. KING: It is concise. It's to the www.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606535 1 point. And

Release Application; CVRA research with notes and Westlaw printouts; CVRA Research (green file folder) Jane Does v. U.S. Misc (green file folder) Florida Bar (redwell) with Self Report folder and 9/16/08 Herman Ltr to EFTA00066351 Box 5: (green file folder) Motion to Quash (file folder) Motion to Qua

(redwell) Jane Does v. US Supplemental Briefing (redwell) Redwell with notes; transcript of 8/14/08 hearing in Jane Doe case (DE27); DE 99 Order; Westlaw research on Obstruction of Justice Charges can be based on false statements in state depositions, including Civil depo, if it is likely to be turned

ation; CVRA research with notes and Westlaw printouts; CVRA Research (green file folder) EFTA00194823 Jane Does I. U.S. Misc (green file folder) Florida Bar (redwell) with Self Report folder and 9/16/08 Ltr to Box E: (green file folder) Motion to Quash (file folder) Motion to Quash Riley Subpoenas (r

(redwell) Jane Does I. US Supplemental Briefing (redwell) Redwell with notes; transcript of 8/14/08 hearing in Jane Doe case (DE27); DE 99 Order; Westlaw research on Obstruction of Justice Charges can be based on false statements in state depositions, including Civil depo, if it is likely to be turned

licious prosecution or abuse of process; 19 rather, it would be through the court with 20 contempt proceedings, perhaps. It would be 21 through the Florida Bar for, you know, 22 inappropriate actions taken by an attorney. It 23 could be perjury for a litigant which would be 24 handled by the state. 25

is the decision in -- bear 20 with me, Judge. 21 THE COURT: No problem. 22 MR. KING: That is the decision in Johnson 23 vs. Libow, a 2012 -- Westlaw 4068409 in 2012. 24 THE COURT: Okay. 25 MR. KING: It is concise. It's to the cogent, most well-reasoned, and rejects those propositions that tw