Epstein Secrets

s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Wein

s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (202)-506-3900 Fax: (212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (applic

s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Wein