Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
conduct ending in 2005 that were neither admitted-to nor within the scope of Mr. Epstein's guilty plea. See People v. Epstein, 89 A.D. 3d 570, 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). While Mr. Epstein has made no subsequent attempt to challenge the continuing nature of his designation, his law-abiding behavior for th
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (133)
Entities connected to both Jessup and N.Y. App
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Jessup·16 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Jessup·11 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Jessup·12 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Jessup·12 w/ N.Y.
New York
LOCATION6 w/ Jessup·16 w/ N.Y.
MA
Martir
PERSON10 w/ Jessup·8 w/ N.Y.
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Jessup·5 w/ N.Y.
Bernie Madoff
PERSON13 w/ Jessup·4 w/ N.Y.
MD
Marc Dreier
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ N.Y.
KA
Karni
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ N.Y.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jessup·8 w/ N.Y.
Contreras
PERSON9 w/ Jessup·6 w/ N.Y.
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·10 w/ N.Y.
Dominguez
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·10 w/ N.Y.
David Mitchell
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·10 w/ N.Y.
United Kingdom
LOCATION8 w/ Jessup·6 w/ N.Y.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·8 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·7 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ Jessup·2 w/ N.Y.
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON9 w/ Jessup·2 w/ N.Y.