Epstein Secrets

dency for tax purposes is not conclusive on the question of where one in fact resides, on a number of occasions since 1995 the taxing authorities of New York State have determined that Mr. Epstein did not spend sufficient time in New York to be considered a resident of New York for tax purposes. Since 1999, Mr

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of thcir true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted f

idency for tax purposes is not conclusive on the question of where one in fact esides, on a number of occasions since 1995 the taxing authorities of New York State have determined that stein did not spend sufficient time in New York to be considered a resident of New York for tax purposes. 999, Mr. Epstein has

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as being 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Robson Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Laduke Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was

dency for tax purposes is not conclusive on the question of where one in fact resides, on a number of occasions since 1995 the taxing authorities of New York State have determined that Mr. geli, Ccs Epstein did not spend sufficient time in New York to be considered a resident of New York for tax purposes. Sinc

g that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Ein i was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted from th