Epstein Secrets

M Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARFtA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 and #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. / PETITIONERS JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S NOTICE IN RESPONSE TO ADMINISTRAT

INSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution. (DE 41). On September 8, 2010, the Court entered an Order administratively closing this case in light of related

Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

have received and read the Litigation Hold letter dated November 2. 2010 regarding Jane Does #1 and #2I United States. Case No.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/Johnson and 1 have taken and agree to continue to take all reasonable steps necessary to preserve the documents and data as instructed in the letter and Fo

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

M Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2010 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Status Report and Respo

HNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution. (DE 41). On September 8, 2010, the Court entered an Order administratively closing this case in light of related

have received and read the Litigation Hold letter dated November 2, 2010 regarding Jane Does #1 and #2 v. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-Mt-MARRA/Johnson and I have taken and agree to continue to take all reasonable steps necessary to preserve the documents and data as instructed in the letter and Fo

was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA 's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

I ha received and read the Litigation Hold letter dated November 4, 2010 regarding Jane Does and #2I United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/Johnson and 1 have taken and agree to continue to take all reasonable st s necessa to reserve the documents and data as instructed in the letter and Form

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to d