Epstein Secrets

Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (1JSAO-SDFLA). 1 write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligati

have received and read the Litigation Hold letter dated November 2. 2010 regarding Jane Does #1 and #2I United States. Case No.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/Johnson and 1 have taken and agree to continue to take all reasonable steps necessary to preserve the documents and data as instructed in the letter and Fo

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA). I write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligatio

Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electroni

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (1JSAO-SDFLA). 1 write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligati

the President's authority to remove executive branch officials had been debated since the passage of the Tenure of Office Act in 1867 over President Johnson's veto. The closeness of the question was underscored by the fact that three Justices, including Justices Holmes and Brandeis, dissented in Myers. Ye

e is currently any lack of coordination, and a new position could lead to duplication of efforts. Furthermore, subsection (a}(2)(A} incorrectly lists the Civil Division and not the Civil Rights Division. 255 Section 236 In subsection (a), DOJ questions the reliability of the congressional findings, especially with