Epstein Secrets

Judge Kenneth A. Marra Cause: no cause specified Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant Petitioner Jane Doe represented by Bradley James Edwards Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL I. Respondent United Sta

tiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the US. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe & filed by United States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 05/30/2011) 06/17/2011 85 Notice of Supplemental Authority re 48 Plaintiff's MOTION for

ed: 03/29/2012) 04/17/2012 L62 MOTION for Protective Order by Intervenors Black Weinberg and LeJkowitz and Opposition to Motions of Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 For Production, Use, and Disclosure of Settlement Negotiations by Roy Black. (Perczek, Jacqueline) (Entered: 04/17/2012) 04/17/2012 161 MOTION fo

Miami, FL 33180 ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) (d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) O 1. U.S. Government PIadM O 2. U.S. Government Defendant ill) O 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) X 4. Diversity (Indicate Citizenship or Parte/ I

us conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe. 24. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jef

turned executed" as the proper Event. (Ik) (Entered: 05/27/2008) 05/29/2008 2 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doc. (Attachments: #J, Exhibit A and B, #2 Text of Proposed Order Default Ord)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 05/29/2008) 06/06/2008 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Denyi

d district courts to find either that: (1) the protective was improvidently granted or (2) the WESTLAW © 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 EFTA00029951 --- PAGE BREAK --- IN RE APPLICATION TO UNSEAL CIVIL DISCOVERY..., Slip Copy (2021) government has established exceptiona

for an order relieving Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP (the "Law Finn") of its obligations under the protective order issued on November 29, 2018, in Jane Doe 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein. et al. I7-CV-616 (IGK) (SN) (S.D.N.Y.). The purpose of such order is to permit the Law Firm to comply with a grand jury subp

ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) q !ely V foul-K/9in- ) 0 4-)/71__ It. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) O 1. U.S. Government Plaintiff O 2 U.S. Government Defendant III) O 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) X 4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties In Item III. CITV.ENSHIP OF P

us conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe. 24. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jef

Y WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) q !ely V foul-K/9in- ) 0 4-)/71__ II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) O 1. U.S. Government Plaintin O 2 U.S. Government Defendant III) O 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) X 4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parbes

tted willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired. 26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had

LAND INVOLVED. APR 1 Attorneys DtKrown) Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Ausuallan Ave., PICA West Palm STEVEN M. old id „taw et B O 2 U.S. Government 0 4 Diven6y Ds knew* In Cittuntan, of Panics In Item III) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIESirace uric...on aim Re ?Mart V. NATURE Ot' SUIT

IM G., the first victim identified in PBPD's investigation. Plaintiff filed motion to remand to state court, which was granted by Judge Marra. 2. Jane Doe #2I. Epstein, 08-CV-80 I 19-KAM: Complaint filed on February 6, 2008, alleging: sexual assault (Count l), and intentional infliction of emotional di

ing trip. (Place a check mark) , or are not Under the Provision of the Privacy Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-579) No information may be released from U.S. Government files without the prior written consent of the individual in question. Consequently, an employee of the U.S. Passport Agency cannot discuss the det

e information of a person not travel th you to be contacted in the event of an emergency. Name Address: Street/n or P.O. Box Apartment or unit x JANE DOE STREET VIMRE SHE LIVES City State Zip Code U m, Phone Number Relationship CITY WHERE SHE LIVES AL 12345 elk 1234567890 I WIFE 20. Travel

an'X'' in One Box Only) III. C TIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES(Plaoem'x-In one ao, for Nam& (For Dian*/ Casa Only) and One Box (or VeknclarsI O I U.S. Government VI 3 FederalQuestion PT! DEF PT! DFF Plaintiff (U.S. Gomm= Not a Pay) Citizen of TVs Sat C I :I Incorporator Next* Place of Stuarts' In

e informed the USAO and the FBI that she was not a victim of any offense committed by Epstein, and, as a result, the USAO did not consider informing Jane Doe #2 about the non-prosecution agreement. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 2(e). 3. Denied. 4. Denied. 5. The

)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respondent points out, the Agreement was not filed in this

Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLI