Epstein Secrets

Y WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) q !ely V foul-K/9in- ) 0 4-)/71__ II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) O 1. U.S. Government Plaintin O 2 U.S. Government Defendant III) O 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) X 4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parbes

006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County). Meanwhile, there is also a parallel federal criminal grand jury action pending in the Southern District of Florida. In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla.) Both cases arise out of the same occurrence and allege that the minor plaintiff is a

LAND INVOLVED. APR 1 Attorneys DtKrown) Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Ausuallan Ave., PICA West Palm STEVEN M. old id „taw et B O 2 U.S. Government 0 4 Diven6y Ds knew* In Cittuntan, of Panics In Item III) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIESirace uric...on aim Re ?Mart V. NATURE Ot' SUIT

ified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest thc jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that identified victims are persons who, while minors, were victims of

Miami, FL 33180 ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) (d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY) O 1. U.S. Government PIadM O 2. U.S. Government Defendant ill) O 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) X 4. Diversity (Indicate Citizenship or Parte/ I

the parallel federal criminal action against him described in that motion (In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB), United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida) (the "Federal Criminal Action"), remains pending. On September 24, 2007, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District

)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respondent points out, the Agreement was not filed in this

s Orders Unsealing the NPA.1° Nor did the trial court's rejection of Petitioner's comity argument depart from the essential requirements of law. In the Southern District of Florida, one of the minor victims of Epstein filed a Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Acts (A-I)." The victim also asked the fe