Epstein Secrets

§ 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

ons, do not hesitate to contact me at the above-referenced number. Enclosure See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See. e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requ

§ 552(bX4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

sel and (b) employees of the Department (or any other government agency). 2 3 See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Request

§ 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

ited States mail for such notice. If the Department is not satisfied that the See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requ

§ 552(bX4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

ing, telephone conversation, or interview between (a) our client's current or See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Theatawat Requ