Epstein Secrets

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 Eas

hat you now object to the Agreement that you negotiated, this is akin to "buyer's remorse." However, you and Mr. Starr have, instead, made claims to the Justice Department that these thoroughly negotiated terms "leave[] wide open the opportunity for misconduct by federal investigators." You then misinterpret several st

eld and a sword? Thus, while we will not involve ourselves in the civil litigation, we will not allow you to 2You may want to review United States. Crompton Corp., 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his EFTA00221297 JAY P. LEF

hat you now object to the Agreement that you negotiated, this is akin to "buyer's remorse." However, you and Mr. Starr have, instead, made claims to the Justice Department that these thoroughly negotiated terms "leave[) wide open the opportunity for misconduct by federal investigators." You then misinterpret several st

Lot 6410 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013333 EFTA00230238 " /13/0 I S(60--)-104; Le:4w 1.3 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013334 EFTA00230239 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 Eas

that neutrality to create a false impression that we do not believe in the validity of the victims' claims. 2You may want to review United States'. Crompton Corp., 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (ND. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N. E. 4 gh Street Miami, FL 33132-2111 December 3, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Le

atute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. nYou may want to review United States v. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N. E. 4 gh Street Miami, FL 33132-2111 Facsimile: November 30, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMI

statute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. You may want to review United States. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N. E. 4 gh Street Miami, FL 33132-2111 (305) 961-9299 Facsimile: (305) 530-6444 Decembe

statute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. nYou may want to review United States. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea