Epstein Secrets

o conduct business. Upon initiating the investigation, without any coordination with the Florida State Attorney's Office and in clear conflict with the Justice Department's Petite Policy, Ms. Villafana immediately issued irrelevant official document requests seeking, among other things, Mr. Epstein's 2004 and 2005 pers

dy evidence. Ms. Villafana launched a totally unsupportable and vastly overreaching sex trafficking investigation without providing notification to the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division and CEOS, as required pursuant to Section 8-3.120 of the USAM. Ms. Villafana then threatened to indict Mr. Epstein for sex tr

overnment could always find a way to indict Mr. Epstein even well after he completed the sentence required of him under the NPA. See United States' Response to Court's Order Requesting Position on Defendant's Motion to Stay, fn. 5, pp. 14-15. Moreover, Ms. Villafana served written notice on Mr. Epstein's counsel t

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 ME. 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 305.961.9290 November 2, 2010 Via E-Mail Wifredo A. Ferr

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 305.961.9290 November 2, 2010 Via E-Mail Wifredo A. Ferr

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N. E. 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 305.961.9290 November 2, 2010 Via E-Mail Wifredo A. Fe

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP Gentlemen: This Office has completed a tho

was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA 's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E. 4 Street liga.3132 November 4, 2010 Via E-Mai( AUSA, Deputy Chief Criminal Divisio

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to d