Epstein Secrets

n for doing so by adding charges of money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business to the investigation." Again, I consulted with the Justice Department's Money Laundering Section about my analysis before expanding that scope. The duty attorney agreed with my analysis. EFTA01718630 U.S. Department o

s Code, Section 1594(b). A TRUE BILL. FOREPERSON R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 49 EFTA01718625 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP ew York, New York 1

ter have no relation to the allegations against Mr. ISpstein. Notably. affix we objected to these overt broad and intrusive requests. Deputy Chief Andrew Laurie denied knowledge of Ms. s actions and Mr Laurie commendably so t igni tiara ly narrow the list of documen requested. In a subsequent court filin

m not at liberty to discuss this matter with you. Moreover, it is nor the practice of this Office to discuss internal Department of Justice policies Aith non-Justice Department persormel. If Mr. Riley believes he has cause to move to quash the subpoena, or if Mr. Epstein does for that matter, counsel for the respective par

ney laundering. That was surely not what Congress intended, how the courts have interpreted the language of the statute, or even how it is viewed by the Department of Justice. 18 U.S.C. § 1960 - Prohibition of Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business Does Not Apply to Mr. Epstein's Alleged Misconduct Likewise, a prosecuti

nsion already requested by Ms. Sanche2 prior to Mr. Richey's appearance as counsel for Mr. Riley. Sincerely, Assistant United States Anorncy cc; Andrew Laurie, Esq. William Richey, Esq. Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011927 EFTA00226715 LAW O1•1Of • Of GISliALD 13. Incotrirr,

ities with the deferred prosecution agreement" and "called a time-out." At that time, Acosta asked the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, located in Washington, D.C., to look at the case.106 CONCEALING THE NPA WHILE EPSTEIN SOUGHT REVIEW 92. Following the entry of t

6. The correspondence further discussed a possible plea disposition that would make it hard for a judge to see what was happening: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to c

ctims of any aspect of the Epstein investigation or non-prosecution agreement, including any emails or other documents sent to "Main Justice" (i.e., the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, Office of Victims of Crime, the Crime Ombudsman, the Office of Professional Responsibility, the Executive Office for U.S. Attorney)

it of any kind to any United States Attorney or Assistant United States Attorney, including but not limited to Alex Acosta, Matthew Menchel, and/or Andrew Laurie, prior to Epstein's plea in June of 2008. upplemental Discovery Request 4. Any emails or other documents, including those circulate within the FBI

ities with the deferred prosecution agreement" and "called a time-out." At that time, Acosta asked the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, located in Washington, D.C., to look at the case.106 CONCEALING THE NPA WHILE EPSTEIN SOUGHT REVIEW 92. Following the entry of t

6. The correspondence further discussed a possible plea disposition that would make it hard for a judge to see what was happening: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to c

ities with the deferred prosecution agreement" and "called a time-out." At that time, Acosta asked the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, located in Washington, D.C., to look at the case.l°6 CONCEALING THE NPA WHILE EPSTEIN SOUGHT REVIEW 92. Following the entry of t

6. The correspondence further discussed a possible plea disposition that would make it hard for a judge to see what was happening: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to c