Epstein Secrets

e provided to review some of our issues and concerns. 1 look forward to speaking with you shortly. Sincerely. RFP MLA 000463 EFTA00208944 • • U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MALI lay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LIP Re: ,leffrev Epste

n for doing so by adding charges of money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business to the investigation." Again, I consulted with the Justice Department's Money Laundering Section about my analysis before expanding that scope. The duty attorney agreed with my analysis. RFP MIA 000468 EFTA00208949 •

DOJ/ODAC 05 10 :Is MO\ 13:22 1:;\ 1 213 6h0 8500 It I RKLINDLF.I.I.1 5 lip 111006/013 1 Kenneth W. Starr Joe D. Whitley Kirkland & Ellis LLP Alston & Bird LIP May 19, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (202) 514.0467 CONFIDENTIAL honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department

the crimes against the victims; (3) discovery of records explicating why the U.S. Attorney's Office decided to grant Epstein federal immunity; (4) the Department of Justice's designation of a representative to explain the Office's decision to resolve the Epstein case without any federal prosecution; (5) mandatory CVRA t

ice Department's Office of Legal Counsel ("OLCi. Maj. Op. at 1213-14 n.20. The Justice Department's 2010 OLC opinion, like the change of position by the Justice Department's local U.S. Attorney's Office, came only after Epstein's victims filed this lawsuit. See Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825, 100 S. Ct. 2486,

NY (4) Lilly Ann Sanchez, Fowler White Burnett, Miami, FL; (5) Jack A. Goldberger, Goldberger & Weiss, West Palm Beach, FL; and (6) Joe D. Whitley, Alston & Bird, Washington D.C.; as well as Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. While not all attorneys participated in each defense presentation, the record he

confident that the einannstances at issue warrant such an examination. Based on our collective experiences, as well as those of other former senior Justice Depanment officials whose advice we have sought, we have never before seen a case more appropriate for oversight and review. Thus, while neither of us has pr

reached. We sincerely appreciate your attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, ) Kenneth W. Starr Kirkland & Ellis la Joe D. Whitley Alston & Bird fa 0840736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001623 EFTA00184945 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 3 ( ( EXHI

rgy U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Labor U.S. Department of State U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Immigration and Customs En

--- PAGE BREAK --- polyfluoroalkyl substances, they should weigh potential costs and benefits before imposing burdensome actions, say attorneys at Alston & Bird. Read full article » Opinion Time To End 'Open Mind' Requirement In Agency Rulemaking A federal court recently found that U.S. Commerce Secretary