Epstein Secrets

§ 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See. e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-011.0002 SDNY_GM_02775033 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORD

§ 552(bX4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0002 SDNY_GM_02775074 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORD

§ 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JP Morgan Chase JPN1-SDNY-CL-002-0002 EFTA00081983 WI LM ERHALE November 15,

§ 552(bX4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by t

v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Theatawat Requested by JP Morgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-005-0002 EFTA00090640 WILMERHALE Esq• March 3,

§ 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, and will continue to remain exempt from mandatory disclosure even after the conclusion of the Department of Justice's ("Department") consideration of this matter. We note further that, since the Confidential Material constitutes investigatory records obtained by th

erenced number. Sincerely, Anjan Sahni Enclosure 2 3 See Dept of-ha:ice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JP Morgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-007-0003 EFTA00096344 WILMERHALE September 2, 20