Epstein Secrets

am) (holding that such persons have rights that have "vested" and that "it would be manifestly unjust" to ply the new Act to them); United States Mitchell, 600 F.Supp. 164 .D.Ca1.1985) ("Congress apparently did not contemplate that individuals released pursuant to [the old Act] would be subject t

phone calls to a telephone used bpane Doe #7. (48) On or about July 5, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. 14 EFTA00191737 (49) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-yea

EFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 3. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to pe orrn, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way,

EFFREY EPSTEIN caused a payment of $200 to be paid to Jane Doe #6. Jane Does #7 and #8 (46) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led T.M., who was then a fifteen-year-old gikand Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-years-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defen

Pagre Ilbt 21 If you have additional I:volition& Mitch Involve this matter, please contact the office li

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

d to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).2 Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-

o was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or about Mitich 11, 2003, an employee of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephon

e of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe [Jane Doe #18] too". 20 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013469 EFTA00230374

more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (48) On or about July 5, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. 14 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013463 EFTA00230368 (49) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the presence of Jan