Epstein Secrets

ee, e.g., Balboa v. State, 446 So.2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. App. 1984) (“opinions, theories, or conclusions of at

not require any mind to pick and choose. Indeed, Jane Doe’s request is significantly narrower that other req

r v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). 2 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013320 --- PAGE BREAK

ards filed a civil sot against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of L.M. See Complaint, LM. v. Epstein, (Exhibit “V”). 3 47. Jane Doe’s federal complaint indicated that she sought damages of more than $50,000,000. Listing the amount of damages sought in the complaint was in accord wit

); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical

hstein's Ponzi scheme had been widely publicized. In addition, if Epstein had thought that there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe's case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any