may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting.” Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). 2 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010567 --- PAGE BREAK --- using a vibrator and he also paid he

may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting.” Fraser v. Security and INV. Corp, 615 So. 2d. 841, 842 (Fla. 4" DCA 1993). The adverse inferences drawn from Epstein’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment unde

SCHULHOF,MARK DESLAURIERS,PAUL J FRASER,RONALD BYNUM,T EDWARD KLEIN,GEORGE

d ltalgas XXYZF IG IM Harry Wyburd Nordex NRDXF NDX1 GR Pinaki Das RWE RWNFF RWE GR Peter Bisztyga RWE RWEOY RWEOY US Peter Bisztyga SSE SSEZF SSE LN Fraser McLaren SSE SSEZY SSEZY US Fraser McLaren Uniper XUIKF UN01 GY Peter Bisztyga UNDERPERFORM Centrica CPYYF CNALN Fraser McLaren Centrica CPYYY CPYYY

may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege - at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4* Dist. Ct. App. 1993). And, in the proper circumstances, «Silence is often evidence of the mos