Epstein Secrets

sertion of fact. See DE362-21. The second sentence is denied because it was Epstein's attorneys, not the United States Attorney's Office, who asked the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Department of Justice, to review the case. See DE362-16 at 6, 7 (Bates Nos. RFP MR 000505, 000506). 92. The first sentence of paragraph 92 is admi

ttorney was an "attorney appointed by the Office to represent the victims — without the knowledge of the victims." The Government enlisted the Hon. Edward B. Davis to serve as a Special Master to assist the U.S. Attorney's Office in selecting an attorney representative, see DE362-9, and Judge Davis selected Ro

sertion of fact. See DE362-21. The second sentence is denied because it was Epstein's attorneys, not the United States Attorney's Office, who asked the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Department of Justice, to review the case. See DE362-16 at 6, 7 (Bates Nos. RFP MR 000505, 000506). 92. The first sentence of paragraph 92 is admi

ttorney was an "attorney appointed by the Office to represent the victims — without the knowledge of the victims." The Government enlisted the Hon. Edward B. Davis to serve as a Special Master to assist the U.S. Attorney's Office in selecting an attorney representative, see DE362-9, and Judge Davis selected Ro

Matthew MencheP, First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey H. Sloman, United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta as well as various members of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) at the Department of Justice including, but not limited to its Chief, . Many of these legal and factual issues have been discussed and

ve. As a result, on October 29, 2007, the parties executed an Addendum wherein it was mutually agreed that former United States District Court Judge Edward B. Davis would serve as the independent third-party. Judge Davis selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and Josefsberg to represent the approximately 3