Epstein Secrets

atalogued above, but I will try to collect them into general categories in chronological order. a. I did not want to meet with counsel for Epstein (Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt) prior to completin m investi ation. My co-counsel ( ) agreed with me. Our supervisor, overruled us. b. AUSA and

egotiations, and enforcement periods. They ranged from the explicit — my July 2007 email exchange with about his violations of the USAM, CVRA, and Ashcroft Memo (Exhibit 3) — to the subtle — repeated requests to just meet with the victims. Here is one especially poignant request from January 31, 2008: Hi

those changes. Criminal Chief participated in numerous meetings on the case, and had private conversations regarding resolution of the matter with Lilly counsel to Mr. Epstein. Ms. had formerly served as Deputy Chief in the Major Crimes Section at the USAO while Mr. was Chief of Major Crimes. As

otiations, and enforcement periods. They ranged from the explicit — my July 2007 email exchange with = about his violations of the USAM, CVRA, and Ashcroft Memo (Exhibit 3) — to the subtle — repeated requests to just meet with the victims. Here is one especially poignant request from January 31, 2008: Hi J

in child exploitation cases was an issue of growing concern, so I was mindful that this plea mechanism that Criminal Chief Menchel had devised with Lilly Ann Sanchez would extinguish, the victims' right to restitution. That was one of the reasons why, on July 4, 2007, I wrote to Mr. Menchel that I be

and enforcement periods. They ranged from the explicit — my July 2007 email exchange with Matt Menchel about his violations of the USAM, CVRA, and Ashcroft Memo (Exhibit 3) — to the subtle — repeated requests to just meet with the victims. Here is one especially poignant request from January 31, 2008: Hi J