Epstein Secrets

thru P-013994 7/3/2007-7/4/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-

pre-indictment consultation contract Work Product 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-013977 thru P-013979 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafafia to Myesha Braden (CEOS) re 2423(b) charging question Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-013980 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafa

Subject: Epstein Hi Drew — I have attached a plea term sheet and the guideline calculation that was given to Mr. Epstein's attorneys on July 3 In. Lilly's letter of August 2nd is sort of in response to that. Several months ago when the pros memo was first sent to you, you mentioned adding a CEOS atto

urt if he is released on bond and a response to a motion to dismiss the indictment on the basis that one or all of the statutes is unconstitutional. Myesha Braden and I have spoken about the case a few times when I was doing research, and she has been wonderful, but if there is someone else that you think woul

ivilege(s) Asserted Box #3 P-011923 Thru P-011966 Folder entitled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: ■ 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to Andrew Lourie with handwritten attorney (Lourie) notes; ■ 6/25/2007 letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman, Matt Menchal, A

ps taken to obtain DOJ authorization Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege 2 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafafta to Myesha Braden (CEOS) re 2423(b) charging question Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege 3 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafafia to

thru P-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-

pre-indictment consultation contract Work Product 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-013977 thru P-013979 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafana to Myesha Braden (CEOS) re 2423(b) charging question Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-013980 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafa

thru P-013994 7/3/2007-714/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie regarding extension of time to respond to subpoenas requested by Lilly Ann Sanchez and possible resolution of case 6(e) Work Product Investigative Privilege Deliberative Process P-013995 thru P-014010 6/12/2007-

pre-indictment consultation contract Work Product 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-013977 thru P-013979 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafana to Myesha Braden (CEOS) re 2423(b) charging question Work Product 6(e) Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege P-013980 5/21/2007 email from Marie Villafa

Subject: Epstein Hi Drew - I have attached a plea term sheet and the guideline calculation that was given to Mr. Epstein's attorneys on July 31'. Lilly's letter of August 2nd is sort of in response to that. Several months ago when the pros memo was first sent to you, you mentioned adding a CEOS atto

urt if he is released on bond and a response to a motion to dismiss the indictment on the basis that one or all of the statutes is unconstitutional. Myesha Braden and I have spoken about the case a few times when I was doing research, and she has been wonderful, but if there is someone else that you think woul

in child exploitation cases was an issue of growing concern, so I was mindful that this plea mechanism that Criminal Chief Menchel had devised with Lilly Ann Sanchez would extinguish, the victims' right to restitution. That was one of the reasons why, on July 4, 2007, I wrote to Mr. Menchel that I be

stein's team was equally successful in DC, where they dictated who could and could not participate in the "independent review" at CEOS. For example, Myesha Braden, who had not yet joined the Leap Year team, was excluded from consideration because she had disagreed with Lilly Ann Sanchez about the handling of