5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
an Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (doc. #50) with a letter just received from the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility. As the Court is aware, briefing on the victims' motion for an order directing the government not to withhold evidence was completed when the victi
prosecutor on the Epstein matter. Without going into the details of that settlement discussion, the result of that meeting was a few days later, Mr. Ferrer sent a request to the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility to investigate and determine whether any misconduct had occurred d
t an investigation. We will contact you if we need further information and/or to inform you of the results of our review. Acting Associate Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice EFTA00205038
PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: OPR complaint Hi Thanks for getting back to me. I was confused about one point — my letter to U.S. Attorney Ferrer requesting further investigation of the Epstein matter didn't appear to me to raise any issues that even arguably could have been raised in litigat
9. The victims pointed out that the Government had admitted, in its response to the request for admission (RFA) #22, that "The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility and/or other Government entities have collected information about .. . Bruce Reinhart's possible involvement in the Epstein matter." The victims wo
liberative process" privilege over allegedly internal communications that were designed to "finalize" a letter that was to be sent to U.S. Attorney Ferrer. DE 243-1 at 5-6 (arguing that certain documents were "part of the internal deliberations to finalize the letter[] to U.S. Attorney Ferrer"). Yet t
n. We will contact you if we need further information and/or to inform you of the results of our review. Ruth Plagenhoef Acting Associate Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice EFTA00205034
) Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: OPR complaint Hi Ruth, Thanks for getting back to me. I was confused about one point — my letter to U.S. Attorney Ferrer requesting further investigation of the Epstein matter didn't appear to me to raise any issues that even arguably could have been raised in litigat
t an investigation. We will contact you if we need further Information and/or to Inform you of the results of our review. Acting Associate Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. De artment of Justice 4 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013951 EFTA00230469
; Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: PF: CDR complaint HI Ruth, Thanks for getting back to me. I was confused about one point — my letter to U.S. Attorney Ferrer requesting further investigation of the Epstein matter didn't appear to me to raise any issues that even arguably could have been raised in litigat
Entities connected to both Office of Professional Responsibility and Ferrer

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
United States
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Ken Starr
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION