Epstein Secrets

ng to object to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought " Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege r

rd Epstein between approximately 2006 and 2007. The statements we seek are those given to the FBI by our clients, each of whom has brought suit as a Jane Doe in the Southern District of Florida. The statements given to the FBI investigators are directly relevant because the FBI investigation concerned the

ng to object to a subpoena directed at a nonparty when the party claims a 'personal right or privilege' regarding the documents sought." Chaikin v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Ins. Co. 2003 WL 22715826 (N.D. Ill. 2003) (emphasis supplied). Defendant Epstein does not claim any personal right or privilege r

OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

st money market account is closed in connection with the oftboarding of the Southern Financial Relationship. The funds appear to be transferred to a Fidelity account belonging to The Butterfly Trust. Julie K. Brown, For Years. Jeffrey Epstein Abused Teen Girls, Police Say. A 77meline of His Case, Miami He

e suit. 5 Gut. thLink & Rockenbach, P.A. Lesley Groff 19 $5,509,464 Jeffrey Epstein Link & Rockenbach represented Groff and Epstein in the Jane Doe 43 lawsuit. It is possible that these payments were made solely for the benefit of Epstein. The transaction dates coincide with the lawsuit. " Se