Epstein Secrets

th to Superhuman AGI Fide implication Dog Dog implication NIRO (.1) !lido a Nice Implication PLN Deduction Rule harchtoclyd on C • • or Python) O PLN INFERENCE DeClarative representation of PLN deduction rule in atomspace .... •. • PIA le a set a Schema Node that can modify the

vironment, without requiring anywhere near a complete simulation of realistic physics. EFTA00624075 300 16 AC1 Preschool Fig. 16.1: Part 1 of a Piagetan conservation of volume experiment: a child observes that two glasses obviously have the same amount of milk in them, and then sees the content of on

, etc. And, as typical, not necessarily representative examples of tasks psychologists use to mea- sure cognitive development (drawn mainly from the Piagetan tradition, without implying any assertion that this is the only tradition worth pursuing), consider the following: 1. Which row has more circles- A

0 18 Advanced Self-Modification: A Possible Path to Superhuman AGI Fido implication — Dog implication Nice PLN Deduction Rule (hard-coded in C++ or Python) ; (8) Fido. : —— > Nice implication - implication i icati N PLN is a set Fido P = Dog Dog bal ee Nice of Schema Nodes that can modify the Atomspac

, etc. And, as typical, not necessarily representative examples of tasks psychologists use to mea- sure cognitive development (drawn mainly from the Piagetan tradition, without implying any assertion that this is the only tradition worth pursuing), consider the following: 1. Which row has more circles- A

nt, without requiring anywhere near a complete simulation of realistic physics. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013215 300 16 AGI Preschool Fig. 16.1: Part 1 of a Piagetan conservation of volume experiment: a child observes that two glasses obviously have the same amount of milk in them, and then sees the content of one

history. In the standard CogPrinte notation as introduced formally in Chapter 20 (where indentation has function-argument syntax similar to that in Python, and relationship types are prepended to their relata without parentheses), for the case C is declarative this would be written as PredictiveExtens

led "cognitive complete- ness" is necessary and sufficient for efficient general intelligence at the level of an inteligent adult human (e.g. at the Piagetan formal level IP ia531). Of course, the above considerations are very, far from a rigorous mathematical proof (or even precise formulation) of this

s history. In the standard CogPrime notation as introduced formally in Chapter 20 (where indentation has function-argument syntax similar to that in Python, and relationship types are prepended to their relata without parentheses), for the case C is declarative this would be written as PredictiveExtensi

lled “cognitive complete- ness” is necessary and sufficient for efficient general intelligence at the level of an inteligent adult human (e.g. at the Piagetan formal level [Pia53]). Of course, the above considerations are very far from a rigorous mathematical proof (or even precise formulation) of this hyp