Epstein Secrets

(attached as Exhibit U). Mr. Perry has acted on behalf of many overseas governments in extradition proceedings; has 27 EFTA00065748 appeared in the High Court, House of Lords and Supreme Court in leading extradition cases; and has acted as an expert consultant to the Commonwealth Secretariat on internation

States v. No. 99-1514, 1999 WL 1456536 (3d Cir. July 13, 1999) 26 United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2004) 27 United States v. Khashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) 27 United States v. Lee, No. CR-99-1417 JP, 2000 WL 36739632 (D.N.M. 2000) 8 United States v. Orta, 760 F.2

(attached as Exhibit U). Mr. Perry has acted on behalf of many overseas governments in extradition proceedings; has 27 EFTA00154544 appeared in the High Court, House of Lords and Supreme Court in leading extradition cases; and has acted as an expert consultant to the Commonwealth Secretariat on internation

States v. No. 99-1514, 1999 WL 1456536 (3d Cir. July 13, 1999) 26 United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2004) 27 United States v. Khashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) 27 United States v. Lee, No. CR-99-1417 JP, 2000 WL 36739632 (D.N.M. 2000) 8 United States v. Orta, 760 F.2

(attached as Exhibit U). Mr. Perry has acted on behalf of many overseas governments in extradition proceedings; has 27 EFTA00094321 appeared in the High Court, House of Lords and Supreme Court in leading extradition cases; and has acted as an expert consultant to the Commonwealth Secretariat on internation

States v. No. 99-1514, 1999 WL 1456536 (3d Cir. July 13, 1999) 26 United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2004) 27 United States v. Khashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) 27 United States v. Lee, No. CR-99-1417 JP, 2000 WL 36739632 (D.N.M. 2000) 8 United States v. Orta, 760 F.2

erseas governments in extradition proceedings; has 27 EFTA00093248 Cfissel211-Z744O3O4A2dit nbeuthMstl 91O2Fr i9822412Bag&lgea4a545 appeared in the High Court, House of Lords and Supreme Court in leading extradition cases; and has acted as an expert consultant to the Commonwealth Secretariat on internation

of the right to appeal an extradition order has been recognized as an indication of the defendant's intent not to flee. See, e.g., United States v. Khashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048, 1052 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) (Judge Keenan found defendant's extradition appeal waiver "manifests an intention to remain here and face t