Epstein Secrets

cenber with what this case is, because I 23 those natters have been fully briefed. 23 keep ➢aying co the Court chat Mr. Edwards wants to 24 Mr. Burlington is here to present argument In 24 try a detonation action, he wants to clear his 2$ response to the notion regarding Dr. Jansen. is name, he wa

seated at counsel table for many years, as I have 12 another disk that they rode and kept. If the Court 13 known Mr. Scarola and Mi➢a Terry, Kr. Burlington, 12 will instruct as part of this order that we II and I think they recognize that when this Court 14 maintain the boxes, because Fowler mite w

RE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it clear to all parties that 10 12 exhibits that. here net disclosed by the end of II For Non-Parties L.M., E.M. 4 Jana Doe 22 1a Deoabor -- and I think it nay have been the 14 De her 22 dace -- I'm not sure about that exact 13 la date -- but exhibits that were no

cenber with what this case is, because I 23 those natters have been fully briefed. 23 keep ➢aying co the Court chat Mr. Edwards wants to 24 Mr. Burlington is here to present argument In 24 try a detonation action, he wants to clear his 2$ response to the notion regarding Dr. Jansen. is name, he wa

seated at counsel table for many years, as I have 12 another disk that they made and kept. If the Court 12 known Mr. Scarola and Hiss Terry, Kr. Burlington, 13 will instruct as part of this order that we 14 and I think they recognize that when this Court 14 maintain the boxes, because Fouler mite w

question in front of you sight now is • very brief, representing three victims; LH, EM and • what to do about this. Well, we knee one thing. • Jane Doe. /Vat ono housekeeping natter. s lie know there's been absolutely no waiver of 10 No have riled a notion to intervene, which is 10 attorney/cl

s served by fax and U.S. Mail to Kendall Coffey, Esq., counsel for Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, individually, and Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Coffey Burlington, 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, Florida 33133, and Paul Singerman, Esq., counsel for Herbert Stettin, Esq. as Court Appointed Receiver

T. S.D. OF FLA. - W.P.B. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE, & INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW (AS TO JANE DOE v. EPSTEIN, Case No. 08-CIV-80893 Marra/Johnson) Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, pur

s to Mr. Stettin. A ~"'r~k. DONE and ORDERED this~ day of ~l:H1,1ary; 2010. Courtesy copies: All Counsel of Record Kendall Coffey, Esq. Coffey Burlington Office in the Grove, Penthouse 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33133 James C. Cunningham, Jr. Berger Singerman, 2000 South Biscayne Blvd.

OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

• seated at counsel table for many years, as I have 12 another disk that they coda and kept. If the C, .1 known Mr. Scarola and Miss Worry, Mr. Burlington, and I think they recognize that when this Court 13 14 will instruct as part of this order that we maintain the boxes, because Fouler mite Minte

oulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE For Non-Parties L.N., E.M. 4 Jane Doe HATCH, JAMES 4 DODGE, P.C. 10 Nest Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 By PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQUIRE 5 For Jeffrey Epstein: 4 ATTERBUR

Y CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on February 11, 2015 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and Burlington, ■., counsel for Plaintiff and to Kendall B. Coffey, Esquire, Coffey and COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, Attorneys for Defendant 9150 S. Dadeland Blvd.

Documents Concerning Your claim for damages in this action. 34. All Documents referred to or relied upon by Plaintiffs to prepare "Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action," which was filed in the Federal Action as Docket Entry #279. 35. All Documents referred to

Honor, the first issue raised with regard to that motion is the argument that that motion is precluded by virtue of collateral estoppel. And Mr. Burlington res judicata -- excuse me Mr. Burlington is here to address that. If it's easier for the Court, I have an extra copy of the motion that I can han

?" Refusal to answer. Fifth Amendment. At page 73, "I would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe in that federal complaint." Refusal to answer. Page 24. "Did you ever have any physical contact with Fifth Amendment. Refusal to answer. Page 26

of any other person and the com- munity. 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 3141 et seq., 3142(e). *969 James L. Sultan, Boston, Mass., with whom Joseph T. Travaline, Burlington, Mass., was on brief, for defendant, appel- lant. Diane M. Kottmyer, Boston, Mass., with whom Ernest S. Dinisco, Jane E. Serene, Sp. Attys., Will

8's eighteenth birthday, and when Jane Doe #19 was seventeen years old. [NB: The police report describes a pattern of activity, including dates when Jane Doe #18 was seventeen years old.] Neither Jane Doe #18 nor #19 ever returned to Epstein's home. Although we have not yet obtained Jane Doe #18's teleph

resented in the lawsuit Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein. 21) A I ston did not represent Epstein. The transaction dates coincide with the lawsuit. Coffey Burlington Alan Dershowitz 3 $37,036 Jeffrey Epstein Coffey Burlington represented Dershowitz in a lawsuit filed by an Epstein accuser? The payments coin

e suit. 5 Gut. thLink & Rockenbach, P.A. Lesley Groff 19 $5,509,464 Jeffrey Epstein Link & Rockenbach represented Groff and Epstein in the Jane Doe 43 lawsuit. It is possible that these payments were made solely for the benefit of Epstein. The transaction dates coincide with the lawsuit. " Se