Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals and entities mentioned include Jeffrey Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2, Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), and Mr. Stettin, who is identified as RRA's Receiver and Chief Restructuring Officer. Other people mentioned include Kendall Coffey, Jeffrey Streitfeld, Kovacs, James C. Cunningham.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals that Jeffrey Epstein sought a court order to preserve evidence, alleging unethical and possibly criminal behavior by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, who represented Jane Doe No. 2. The court granted a temporary order for evidence preservation and then addressed the matter further with the involved parties.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals and entities mentioned include Jeffrey Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2, Scott Rothstein, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), and Mr. Stettin, who is identified as RRA's Receiver and Chief Restructuring Officer. Other people mentioned include Kendall Coffey, Jeffrey Streitfeld, Kovacs, James C. Cunningham.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals that Jeffrey Epstein sought a court order to preserve evidence, alleging unethical and possibly criminal behavior by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, who represented Jane Doe No. 2. The court granted a temporary order for evidence preservation and then addressed the matter further with the involved parties.

DOJ-COURT-482

Document DOJ-COURT-482 is a Joint Agreed Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida regarding Jeffrey Epstein's motion for the preservation of evidence in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein.

The document shows that Jeffrey Epstein filed a motion requesting the preservation of evidence, alleging unethical and potentially criminal misconduct by the Plaintiff's counsel, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. The court reviewed the file and RRA's response, entering an order regarding the preservation of specific documents. This order addresses concerns raised about the conduct of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler and aims to ensure the availability of relevant evidence.

Key Highlights

•The document is a Joint Agreed Order on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Order for the Preservation of Evidence.
•Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. (RRA), Plaintiff's counsel, is accused of unethical and possible criminal misconduct.
•The motion requests an order requiring the preservation of certain documents identified in Composite Exhibit A.

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the case open

Filthy Rich

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes

The Ultimate Ponzi: The Scott Rothstein Story

Document Information

Bates Range

DOJ-COURT-482

Pages

Source

DOJ First Production

Original Filename

482.pdf

Document Content

Page 1 - DOJ-COURT-482_p1

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 482 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010

Page 2 - DOJ-COURT-482_p2

Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. -----------------'' Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 I --------------- MAR - 9 2010 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. 01ST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. -W.P.B. J OI NT AGREED ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE This matter came before the Court on Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's Motion for Order for the Preservation of Evidence, & Incorporated Memo~um ~ A(p- LID'.J of Law ("Motion to Preserve Evidence"), dated November 12, 2009. The Court having reviewed the file including Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.'s November 16, 2009 Response to Defendant's Emergency Motion for Order for the Preservation of Evidence, the Court enters this Order: Defendant Epstein's November 12, 2009 Motion to Preserve Evidence [DE # 405] alleges that Plaintiff's counsel, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. ("RRA") has been accused of serious unethical and possible criminal misconduct and requests an order requiring the preservation of certain documents identified in Composite Exhibit A to his Motion to Preserve Evidence. On November 13, 2568019·3 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 482 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2010

Page 3 - DOJ-COURT-482_p3

Page 2 of 3 Jane Doe No.2 v. Epstein Case No. 08-CIV-801189 Order on Epstein's Emergency Motion for Order for the Preservation of Evidence