5
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
schedule, and asked me to put off until September 7, 2007, so that could attend. Mr. Lefkowitz also indicated that he might appeal my decision to Washington M., if my decision was contrary to his client's interest. 1 agreed to the September 71° meeting, despite the fact that our AUSA had an indictment ready
m of a violation of [enumerated sections of Title ls] and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation .. . may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee." Thus, had this Office p
cued from landfills. Lianis Marrero Mendez Paralegal I Contractor Fraud Section, Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice 1400 New York Ave, NW Washington, O.C. 20005 [email protected] Office: (202) 514.5650 Cell: (202) 230.6206 EFTA00161684
rerogative, then what role is there for a DOJ taint team? Some courts have expressly declined to follow the Fourth Circuit. For instance, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York remarked in the September U.S. v. Avenatti decision: To the extent that the Fourth Circuit's decision ... can
e Case No. noanna-r ri I Related Miscellaneous numbers: Defendant(s) in federal custody as of Defendant(s) in state custody as of Rule 20 from the District of Is this a potential death penalty case? (Yes or No) No 7. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Northern Region of the U.S. A
uez and to defeat any claim of "entrapment." None of the items contain any privileged information. The first item is a subpoena issued on behalf of the U.S. District Court and served by an attorney upon a non-party witness. The second items are a deposition that was attended by a number of attorneys representing parti
the reason for the rejection of a fund was because it would place an upper limit on Chicago Hong Kong London LOA Angeles Munich San Francisco WAShinglon, RFP MIA 000025 EFTA00184891 12111eA)4 d:birc4b736-KAM Document 362-17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 P.;ge3 of 14 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP MIS
. if any of the victims identified in the federal investigation lite suit pursuant to IN U.N.C. # 2255. Epstein will not cunttaa the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter. and Epstein will not context that the identified victims are person
EAK --- EXHIBIT A HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010891 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 2 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. / D
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010892 →eriod at issue. Best Regards, Louie Freeh HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010909 --- PAGE BREAK --- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20223 Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Branch Communications Center 245 Murray Lane, SW, Building T-5 Washington, D.C. 20223 Date
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010910 →Entities connected to both Washington, D.C. and United States District Court

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Donald Trump
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON