Epstein Secrets

ersons protected by a constitutional, common-law or statutory privilege, . . . is particularly applicable to grand jury proceedings." Branzburg v. Hayes , 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) (citations omitted). In R. Enterprises , the Supreme Court held that subpoenas cannot be quashed on the basis of irreleva

ing filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for United States EFTA0021

ase law." Thigpen v. United Parcel Servs., Inc., 990 So. 2d 639, 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Johnson v. State, 863 So. 2d 271, 278 (Fla. 2003)); Hayes v. Wal- Man Stores, Inc., 933 So. 2d 124, 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); DeVille v. State, 917 So. 2d 1058, 1059 (Fla. 4`h DCA 2006); Dixon v. State, 911

ions involved Edwards' three clients as follows: 6. and 16. Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Consolidated Action, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-80119 [as to Edwards' representation only] 13. E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach Count

t until every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed.' Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 701, 92 S.Q. 2646, 2667, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972) (quoting United Sixes v. •Stone, 429 F.2d 138, 140 (24 Cir.1970)); In re Grand Jury

aterial) Descri don: r 9 EFTA01699656 09/06/2006 20:41 FAX 5618021787 USA° WPB FL i3002 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE est alm Beac F on. a Re: Federal Grand Jury Subpoena Dear 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beac