Epstein Secrets

mingly broad scope of the investigation, Ms. asserts her rights under the Fifth Amendment. Indeed, considering that both the state authorities in Palm Beach County and your office are conducting investigations, there is every reason for her to be concerned and therefore to assert her constitutional rights. If

lished under chapter 5, title 28, United States Code, a United States bank- ruptcy court established under chapter 6, title 28, United States Code, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, the District Court of Guam, the District Court of the Virgin Islands, the United State

ion Air, Inc. R (192) On or about May 1, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and NADIA MARCINKOVA traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. (193) On or about Max 14, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and NADIA MAR

e was procedural and did not inflict greater .punishment than the law imposed at the time the offense was committed. Id. at 1275-76. In addition, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has held that a statute providing for pretrial detention of defendants charged with first degree murder was not ex post facto as a

ly broad scope of the investigation, Ms. Ross asserts her rights under the Fifth Amendment. Indeed, considering that both the state authorities in Palm Beach County and your office are conducting investigations, there is every reason for her to be concerned and therefore to assert her constitutional rights. If

lished under chapter 5, title 28, United States Code, a United States bank- ruptcy court established under chapter 6, title 28, United States Code, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, the District Court of Guam, the District Court of the Virgin Islands, the United State