3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Dunbar v. United States, 502 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974). U
nary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendme
discoverable, even if not admissible at trial, so long as the information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Dunbar v. United States, 502 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974). Under Fed. R. Civ. P., 26(b)(1) a court may limit discovery of relevant material if it determines
23240 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 6 of 22 or imaginary, hazards of incrimination." United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce
discoverable, even if not admissible at trial, so long as the information is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Dunbar v. United States, 502 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974). Under Fed. R. Civ. P., 26(b)(1) a court may limit discovery of relevant material if It determines
98 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 6 of 22 or imaginary, hazards of incrimination." United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce
Entities connected to both Dunbar and Apfelbaum

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONHubbell
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Edwin
PERSONTurley
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Bernie Sanders
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSONGoodwin
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
J. Robert Oppenheimer
PERSONKatherine W. Ezell
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON