Epstein Secrets

ms & Co. l. Wyler, 182 F.Supp. 2d 679, 681 (N.D. Ill. 2002). Defendant's reliance on United States I. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27 (2000), is inadequate. In Hubbell it was apparent from the breadth of the description of documents demanded in the government's subpoena that "the prosecutor needed respondent's assi

pondent's assistance both to identify ' See Interrogatory nos. 7, 8, 10, 11, 12. -4- EFTA00221724 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2009 Page 5 of 11 potential sources of information and to produce those sources." Id. at 41. In Bear Stems the Court explained that the fact

ances where the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena or production request has a compelled testimonial aspect. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the existence or location of the requested documents are unknown, fa where production would 2 EFTA00222443

tions in the related cases cannot be forgotten. (E.g., ss& DE 242, 293, and 462). 1 EFTA00222442 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 477 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/26/2010 Page 2 of 24 Production of information in one case could provide a link in the chain of evidence used to prosecute Epstein for a crime o

e act of production where, as here, it involves a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v, Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000)• Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against

OetA) rfuCate rmr9 e. or- r:le, [Nader ,E35 IvA.5 N155; in Awl° Co r r Ire° , Pile-s. EFTA00175428 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 101, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPST