Epstein Secrets

nd as well in areas that could result in criminal prosecution. See generally Hoffman v United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951) and United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000). 11. Therefore, Epstein is not required to produce any documents or responses to interrogatories. I

wing Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on t,~'day of.m-i;,..,!1.,t,t,LJU.C, 2009. Respect ull x, /4ib11J-ifte, D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Dri

e act of production where, as here, it involves a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000); Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against

119-KAM Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 9 of 11 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page9 By: ___ _,_ ____ _ ROBERT D. RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive

ested documents, as to their authenticity, and as to the defendant's selection of them as meeting the requests for production. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the existence or location of the requested documents are unknown, or where production would "implicitly auth

ng Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on thislZ day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, By I.Jlf,tE ROBERT '.cR.rfTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Driv

predictably used to bolster the criminal-related allegations against Epstein. See generally Hoffman v United States 341 US 479, 486 (1951), U.S. v Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36 (2000). 11 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2009 Page 12 of 20 12 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KA

. By:.IZ'::1-:::--:i'-'~:::::::C':":"".:-:::::--::-:: RO E . CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/

Preeminent) and BV Distinguished& are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc.. used under in accordance with the Martindale.Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Articles, Publications & Lectures Articles Author, 'A Zinger to IRS: Revisiting Artistes and Spo

don, UK. April 2013 • Speaker. 'Selling from Abroad into the United States: Challenges and Opportunities.' 31st Amual International Tax Conference, Florida Bar and the Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Miami, FL. January 2013 • Panel Chair. 'Acquisition and Reorganization of Mining Projects

e act of production where, as here, it involves a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000); Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976)• McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against

9-KAM Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 06:10:2009 Page 9 of 11 Doe 101 v. Epstein Pago 9 Respectfully sub By: ROBERT D. RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar 224162 MICHAEL J PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN, CR1TrON, LUMER & COLEMAN 515 N. FlagJer Drive, Suite 400 ach, FL 33401 (Counsel for Def

nces as here "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see ado Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The

, P.A. & 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Counsel for Defendant Respectfully sub By: ROBERT D. RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401

nces as here "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The

in 14 EFTA00067396 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 15 of 15 Page 15 Res By: RO Florida Bar No. Florida Bar B ., ESQ. SQ. , LUTTIER & COLEMAN (Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) 15 EFTA00067397

e act of production where, as here, it involves a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v, Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000)• Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against

-80119-KAM Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 9 of 11 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 9 Respectful! By: ROBERT D. R1TTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BUI 1E,N1, LUTHER & COLEMAN 515 N. Hagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax (Course or