Epstein Secrets

t that Rule 412 affects not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also “inform the discovery process.” Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The Committee Notes state, in relevant part, as follows: Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barri

STRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSO

t that Rule 412 affects not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also “inform the discovery process.” Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The 3 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 3 of 10 Committee Notes s

STRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSO

aracevic, T. (1999) The Use of Relevance Feedback on the Web: Implications for Web IR System Design, 1999 World Conference on the WWW and Internet, Honolulu, Hawaii. 24-30 October. Jansen, B.J. and Pooch, U. (1999) Improving the Performance of Existing Information Retrieval Systems Using a Software Agen

76 EFTA00601652 Appendix B Testimony Cases Last Four Years Year Retained Deliverables Retained by Case 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Jane Doe v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Ltd.; Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Aramark Services, In

ct that Rule 412 affects not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also "inform the discovery process." Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The Committee Notes state, in relevant part, as follows: Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barrin

Interrogatory (# 18) seeking to unearth explicit information on every bit of possible sexual conduct and activity in chronological order which each Jane Doe might have engaged in since age 10, including the names and phone numbers of all persons with whom they had sexual contact.' Plaintiffs properly ob

ct that Rule 412 affects not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also "inform the discovery process." Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The 3 EFTA00222173 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 05;06/2009 Page 4 of 10 Committe

quest #s 10, 11, 17 and 18) requests that seek to unearth all recordings and depictions of every instance of sexual conduct and activity which each Jane Doe might have engaged and documents evidencing the names and contact information of each sexual partner over the past nine years. Plaintiffs properly

Western Psychological Association, Reno Northwestern Law School for prosecutors and defense attorneys, Chicago American Bar Assn, Litigation Sect, Honolulu British Psychological Society, Cognitive Section, Cambridge, England 1990 Leiden University, the Netherlands Emory University, Flashbulb Memory

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu

ysis of Violent Crime, F.B.I. Academy, Quantico, Virginia Visiting Professor of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii Visiting Professor of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii Distinguished Fellow, Center for

k, New York) [2nd Circuit Opinion: 938 F.2d 1535 (2nd Cir. 1991)] Testified at deposition, 5/13/90 Testified in court (trial or hearing), 5/14/90 Jane Doe v. Stuart Brown. M.D. (San Diego, California) Testified by deposition, 6/6/90 Carin Evans vs. Richard Benton, Ph.D. (Houston, Texas) Testified at

, Atty. Gen. Territory of Hawaii, J. Gamer Anthony, Special Deputy Atty. Get, Rhoda'. Lewis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard K. Sharpies', Deputy Atty. Honolulu, T. H., for sr pellants. Bouslog & Symonds and Harriet Bous- log, all of Honolulu, T. H., for appellees. Thomas M. Waddoups, Samuel P. King, Edwa

s. To inform Jane Doe of dates that he had arranged, Evans called Jane Doe on a cellular telephone that she had acquired from him. Evans also gave Jane Doe's cellular telephone number to customers and told Jane Doe to arrange dates when customers called. During the dates, Ev- ans called Jane Doe on the