Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
t “[a]lthough the present motion arises in the context of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 “is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions”).
Page 4 of 10 Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc., 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); Sanch
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 4 of 9 - - 5 of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 “is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions”). A
on v. Eastern Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc., 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); Sanche
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
; P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.R.D. 179 (D. Mad. 1997); Sanchez v. Zabihi, 166 F.R.D. 500 (D. N.M. 1996); and Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan 1996). Plaintiff’s reliance on these cases in support of her position, however, is misplaced in that each of
rron v. Eastern Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc., 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.R.D. 179 (D. Mad. 1997); Sanchez v. Zabihi, 166 F.R.D. 500 (D. N.M. 1996); and Stalnaker v. Kmart C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ent 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 05'06/2009 Page 5 of 9 of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker ICmart Corp. 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 "is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions"). As t
Herron,. Eastern Industries. Inc. 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons'. Food Lion Inc. 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder I John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); Sanchez
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (25)
Entities connected to both Stalnaker and P.J. Herchenroeder
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Stalnaker·4 w/ P.J.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON5 w/ Stalnaker·4 w/ P.J.
BA
Barta
PERSON5 w/ Stalnaker·4 w/ P.J.
HE
Herron
PERSON5 w/ Stalnaker·4 w/ P.J.
GI
Gibbons
PERSON5 w/ Stalnaker·4 w/ P.J.
BA
Balas
PERSON4 w/ Stalnaker·4 w/ P.J.
Oliver Stone
PERSON4 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
SA
Sanchez
PERSON4 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
ZA
Zabihi
PERSON4 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON4 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
D. Haw.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON4 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
Jacobs
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
Honolulu
LOCATION3 w/ Stalnaker·3 w/ P.J.
SM
Stuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON3 w/ Stalnaker·2 w/ P.J.
City and County of Honolulu
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Stalnaker·2 w/ P.J.
OR
Ordover
PERSON3 w/ Stalnaker·2 w/ P.J.
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Stalnaker·2 w/ P.J.
D. Kan.
LOCATION3 w/ Stalnaker·2 w/ P.J.
Eastern Industries, Inc.
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Stalnaker·2 w/ P.J.