Epstein Secrets

ROSENFELD,MARC COCHRANE,MARY M BURDETT,DR ARTHUR C HAUSTRUP DEV CORP PHILL

QUINN,OLIVER H LOCKER,NANCY OWEN,JANE D CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD KELLER,MICHAEL

RT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANNSANCHEZ, ESQ: ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00235711 Dac-C7-07 04:65ret F turf owl r -1(hi to Burnett 305789920; T-066 P OC3/001 F-976 Aintisation I. Jeffrey B. Epstein do hereby io-affami the Non-Prostoution Acton/ad and Addendum Ad= dated Oct

JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES CASE NO:

V WINE SPECIALS limited Tit, Good ORO 07 CS ;1011 00:1111 Smknoft ea urn mantra lest sM Ralf $1599 1,76L R114148 Risplaill amino:Ann ; Burnett's Vodka " Baeardl Light GOld $1099 I I I I t.75L - • '16" 0 • • m i int nn frb: PG01110 "467" t s•PriimalM 1.0 marl nt AsIarfratal

on as a teen and sexually abused. Prominent Miami at- torney Robert Josefsberg filed the most recent federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times while 17 years old and was paid S200 at least once for her time there, according to the complaint.

179601 f EFTA00179602 EFTA00179603 EFTA00179604 EFTA00179605 EFTA00179606 CONTACT LIST 1) Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Fowler, White and Burnett Espirito Santo Plaza le Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131-3300 148 East 78'h Street New York, NY 10021-0406 Black, Srebnick, Kornspan

w-Trije rft... -;... .1- is X Y - JANE DOE #21? Z EPSTEIN EMPLOYEES - ,,..., AA IC___ _I ..--4arte] ---,—. EFTA00179599 JANE DOES 1-19 Jane Doe # Old Jane Doe # New Jane Doe # Old Jane Doe # 1 n/a 11 13 2 n/a 12 10 3 n/a 13 5 4 n/a 14 3 5 1 15 11 6 4 16 2 7 12 17

EFCOORT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANNSANCTBZ, ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA01723892 Dec-OT-OT Bil: 65pm F torfotti et -*I to Burnett • 308TBBBt01 T-BBB P.003/004 F-ITS Allinostioa I. leffreyt Epstein do hereby Era= the Nce-Prostantion Agreement amlAcIdateluat to Stunt Stu,

0 p.m. This would indicate that he made a special trip back to the office where the deposition was going on and for lack of better terms bumped into Joane Doe #3. This shows that his travels back to that location was intential and in conflict with his probation log. COUNT #6 On Wednesday Februa 3 2010

ffense; EFTA00226275 616 376 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES procedural error by the Plaintiff. Plain- tiffs situation is very similar to that in Burnett and other cases where equitable tolling has been found to apply. See Bur- nett, 380 U.S. at 434-35, 85 S.Ct. 1050; Berry v. Pacific Sportfishing, I

affirm the judgment of the District Court. John DOE # 1; Kelly Doe # 1, Parents of Jane Doe # 1, Individually and as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; Kelly Doe # 2, Parents of Jane Doe # 2, as Guardians on behalf of Minor Jane Doe # 2 I William Lawson CHAMBERLIN, Jr.; Kathr