Epstein Secrets

And Violations, In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia, 959 F. Supp. 1529 (S.D. Ma. 1997) In re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia involved the crash of an American Airlines plane as it arrived in Cali just before Christmas, 1995. The crash killed 159 passengers and crew members. One hundred and thirty lawsuits were con

161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING OF INTERVENORS ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LE

HN F KENNEDY 200CT ING TERMINAL 2 TERMINAL 1 MEAL 1 STOP -RESERVATION CONFIRMED 22:50 DURATION FRANKFURT NEW YORK IRCRAFT: BOEING 747-400 AMERICAN AIRLINES 200CT AA 1701 -N SUN 'NON SMOKING MISCELLANEOUS NEW YORK NY MIAMI FL JOHN F KENNEDY MIAMI INTL TERMINAL 8 250P 604P NON STOP RESERVATIO

ered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 2 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. DECLARATION OF JANE DOE 3 1. The Court is familiar with me from my previous declara

D THE COMMON LAW PRIVILEGE OF PILOTS REPORTING INCIDENTS AND VIOLATIONS EFTA00301871 In re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia involved the crash of an American Airlines plane as it arrived in Cali just before Christmas, 1995. The crash killed 159 passengers and crew members. One hundred and thirty lawsuits were con

ls between his lawyers and federal prosecutors during the criminal investigation [DE 50 at 5]. Mr. Epstein also opposes the motion of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to use the content of the communications that memorialized ongoingse plea and settlement negotiations as substantive evidence in their quest to inva

D THE COMMON LAW PRIVILEGE OF PILOTS REPORTING INCIDENTS AND VIOLATIONS EFTA00301894 In re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia involved the crash of an American Airlines plane as it arrived in Cali just before Christmas, 1995. The crash killed 159 passengers and crew members. One hundred and thirty lawsuits were con

ls between his lawyers and federal prosecutors during the criminal investigation [DE 50 at 5]. Mr. Epstein also opposes the motion of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to use these plea negotiations as substantive evidence in their quest to invalidate the Non- Prosecution Agreement [DE 51], as well as their motion t

onvicted. He is scheduled to make his first federal court appearance Monday in Amarillo, Texas. The article noted that Fagiana was a passenger on an American Airlines flight Wednesday from Fort Worth, Texas, to Bozeman, Montana. Pilots landed the plane in Amarillo instead. The article stated that the FBI agent's

as HB in court documents sued Classica Cruise Operator Ltd for the May 2023 incident. The article mentioned that her cabinmate, identified only as "Jane Doe" or "SE" in court documents, brought additional allegations against him in her complaint filed in West Palm Beach, Florida. The article added that D

VALID TICKET OR RECEIPT Customer Number 6435R7F Agent SH *TICKET PURCHASE WITH CA 0426' Monday, February 03, 2020 Confirmation HEZZTD Flight AMERICAN AIRLINES 6137 DEPARTURL ARRIVAL NEW YORK JFK, NY LONDON HEATHROW, UNITED KINGDOM 8:15 PM, Feb 03, 2020 8:10 AM, Feb 04, 2020 Status Confirmed Class

ess. Q35: Please list the names and nationalities of persons to be interviewed or deposed, including addresses and telephone numbers if available. Jane Doe, Swedish Q36: Is the prosecution of a foreign national foreseen? If so, provide name and nationality. A subject of the investigation is Ghislaine M

nd Violations, In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia, 959 F. Supp. 1529 (S.D. Fla. 1997) In re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia involved the crash of an American Airlines plane as it arrived in Cali just before Christmas, 1995. The crash killed 159 passengers and crew members. One hundred and thirty lawsuits were con

ney General or any office under his direction.'" Id. at *2 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6)). For these reasons, the Court should deny the motion of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to discover and use the plea negotiation letters as evidence. PART II MR. EPSTEIN'S PLEA NEGOTIATIONS ARE PRIVILEGED AND NOT DISCO