Epstein Secrets

rtment of Corrections requires an order placing someone on community control before the Department of Corrections will supervise that person. Judge Pucillo, the retired judge that took Mr. Epstein's plea,inadvertently neglected to enter the order placing Mr. Epstein on Community Control I. When Judge

cial Master be empowered to resolve any issues that Mr- -Jesefsber-ghe and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the unusual-isseesattorney representative -that have-s

10 Your Hanoi's. It looks like sort of everybody approached 10 Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 simply does not give 11 the bench and Judge Pucillo said let's take it under seal. 11 this Court the right to reactivate the procedure that you If Mr. Epstein's counsel is not prepared to go forward

elled? 2 MR. EDWARDS: Edwards. E-D-W-A-R-D-S. 3 THE COURT: Okay. 4 MR. OOLDBERGER: For the other side, Your Honor. 5 Jack Goldbaga along with Robert Critton on behalf of 6 Jeffity Epstein. 7 THE COURT: It is the Post's and E.W.'s Motion to 8 Intervene for the purpose of unsealing records? 9 MR. BE

. A. Marie Esq. June 19, 2009 Page 8 placing someone on community control before the Department of Corrections will supervise that person. Judge Pucillo, the retired judge that took Mr. Epstein's plea, inadvertently neglected to enter the order placing Mr. Epstein on Community Control 1. When Judge M

d to resolve any fee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approac

10 Your Hanoi's. It looks like sort of everybody approached 10 Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 simply does not give 11 the bench and Judge Pucillo said let's take it under seal. 11 this Court the right to reactivate the procedure that you If Mr. Epstein's counsel is not prepared to go forward

elled? 2 MR. EDWARDS: Edwards. E-D-W-A-R-D-S. 3 THE COURT: Okay. 4 MR. OOLDBERGER: For the other side, Your Honor. 5 Jack Goldbaga along with Robert Critton on behalf of 6 Jeffity Epstein. 7 THE COURT: It is the Post's and E.W.'s Motion to 8 Intervene for the purpose of unsealing records? 9 MR. BE

Villafana, Esq. June 19, 2009 Page 8 placing someone on community control before the Department of Corrections will supervise that person. Judge Pucillo, the retired judge that took Mr. Epstein's plea, inadvertently neglected to enter the order placing Mr. Epstein on Community Control 1. When Judge M

d to resolve any fee related issues that the Podhurst firm and Mr. Epstein's civil counsel cannot resolve. See Exhibit 20, June 15, 2009 Letter from Robert Critton to Kathy Ezell. There is nothing about the exchanges between counsel and the USAO regarding the attorney representative that even begins to approac

ents apparently restrict any federal prosecution of the Defendant for offenses related to the conduct to which he pleaded guilty in this case. Judge Pucillo accepted the agreement for filing during a bench conference on June 30, 2008. The agreement, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in

et: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331977 EFTA_00204703 EFTA02729687 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Pirafgbef ar 2 Robert D. Critton Jr. From: Adam Morowitz iahorowitzesexabuseetbxney.corni Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:43 AM To: Michael J. Pike; Robert D. Critton Jr. Cc:

eveal that the procedures were complied with. My review is similar to Your Honor's. It looks like sort of everybody approached the bench and Judge Pucillo said let's take it under seal. If Mr. Epstein's counsel is not prepared to go forward today and meet hia burden, then I would ask thet this Court

name is spelled? HR. EDWARDS: Edwards. E-D-N-A-R-D-S. THE COURT: Okay. HR. GOLDBERGER: For the other side, Your Honor, Jack Goldberger along with Robert Critton on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. THE COURT: It is the Post's and E.M.'s Motion to Intervene for the purpose of unsealing records? HR. BERGER: Yes, a