Epstein Secrets

r seal, as exhibits 1-10. Although marked by the government as "Confidential," the Materials are not "Confidential" as that term has been defined by the Second Circuit. They consist of ex pane pleadings filed by the government, ex pane transcripts, and ex pane rulings. Boies, Schiller & Flexner ("BSF') lawyers, coo

iami Herald appealed on September 28, 2018. On July 3, 2019 the Second Circuit reversed Judge Sweet's ruling. Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 44-45 (2d Cir. 2019). Upon the issuance of the mandate, on August 9, 2019, it largely unsealed the summary judgment materials to the public and the press and reman

ed in state court litigation); Rosales-Martinez v. Palmer, 753 F.3d 890, 894 (9th Cir. 2014) (can take judicial notice of proceedings on any court); Fletcher v. Menard Correctional Center, 623 F.3d 1171, 1173 (7th Cir. 2010) (court can take judicial notice of other proceedings in a case involving the sam

years' imprisonment. (Third Comey Decl. (Dkt. No. 59) 1 8; 20 Cr. 330, Judgment (Dkt. No. 696)) On July 7, 2022, Maxwell appealed her conviction to the Second Circuit. (Third Comey Decl. (Dkt. No. 59) 1 9) Maxwell seeks, inter a "a new trial based on alleged juror misconduct and alleged evidentiary issues." (a)

t purposes where the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could decide in the non-movant's favor." Beyer v. County of Nassau, 524 F.3d 160, 163 (2d Cir. 2008). "When no rational jury could find in favor of the nonmoving party because the evidence to support its case is so slight, there is no genuine

ine issue of material fact where none would otherwise exist.'" Hicks v. Baines, 593 F.3d 159, 166 (2d Cir. 2010) (alterations in original) (quoting Fletcher v. Atex, Inc., 68 F.3d 1451, 1456 (2d Cir. 1995)). 6 EFTA00038657 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:17-cv-03956-PGG Document 64 Filed 06/25/24 Page 7 of

nt asserts has been harmed by a crime or who self-identifies as such qualifies as a "victim"); cf. In re WR. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 561 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that the CVRA does not grant victims any rights against individuals not convicted of a crime, but the government can attempt to obtain

vin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961) (holding that prisoner should have been granted change of venue where pre-trial publicity caused prejudice). But cf. Fletcher, supra note 155, at 252 (calling for abolition of a defendant's right to change venue because it "is, in effect, to accord the defense a whole peremp