Epstein Secrets

rder requiring disclosure to the Providence Journal of various documents reflecting the results of an unauthorized and illegal wiretap. Id. at 889. The First Circuit explained that litigants are entitled to meaningful appellate review, which demands the opportunity for the appellate court to "take a fresh look a

to Stay Pending Appeal or, in the Alternative, Motion for a Temporary Administrative Stay Pending Full Consideration of the Motion to Stay Ty Gee Laura Menninger Adam Mueller Z1LLUI JW llyt/Gtialtt Llftt-1lLttliG EFTA00074904 Case 20-2413. Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page3 of 38 Table of Conte

1068 & 1068-1) EXHIBIT 6: June 24, 2020 Response by Miami Herald (Dist. Ct. Doc. 1067) EXHIBIT 7: July 1, 2020 Reply by Ms. Maxwell & Decl. by Ms. Menninger in Support Thereof (Dist. Ct. Docs. 1073, 1074, and 1074-1, 1074-2, 1074-3, 1074-4) EXHIBIT 8: Transcript of July 23, 2020 Hearing EXHIBIT 9: July

15-cv-07433-LAP \ Is. Maxwell's Objections to Unsealing Docket Entries 143, 173, and 199 and to Unsealing Docket Entries 164 and 230 at This Time. Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 EFTA00022960 --- PAGE BREAK -

s have also recognized the principle that the filing of a document gives rise to a presumptive right of public access"). Amodeo 1, 44 F.3d at 145. The First Circuit "has taken a somewhat different approach," id. In that circuit "documents must have a role in the adjudication process in order to be accessible and

SMISS COUNTS ONE THROUGH FOUR OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT AS TIME-BARRED Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00028903

s has clearly manifested its intent to the contrary." Gentile, 235 F. Supp. 2d at 654 (quoting Hughes, 520 U.S. at 946 (emphasis added by court)).5 The First Circuit, addressing the issue on an ineffective assistance of counsel of claim (and thus not reaching a merits decision), issued a similar caution in the sp