Back to Network
11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
22 / 11
Mentions
Document Mentions (11 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cific timing, but assuming a schedule along those lines is met, the Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial. See Coppa, 267 F.3d at 144. B. Jencks Act material and co-conspirator statements Maxwell also seeks to expedite discovery of Jencks Act material and non-excu
atements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the Government represents that it has already produced an unredacted copy of the other requested FBI report, and so that re
207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (81)
Entities connected to both Coppa and Lanfgraf
Brady
PERSON28 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON27 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
United States
LOCATION26 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
Giglio
PERSON26 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
CO
Collins
PERSON25 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON21 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
WA
Walker
PERSON20 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON20 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
AN
Annabi
PERSON20 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
the White Plains Division
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
RU
Russo
PERSON19 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
TH
Thompson
PERSON19 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
TR
Tracy
PERSON19 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON19 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
FBI
ORGANIZATION16 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON16 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
JO
Josephberg
PERSON15 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf
The Third Circuit
ORGANIZATION15 w/ Coppa·11 w/ Lanfgraf