Epstein Secrets

6/10/2009 EFTA00175252 CWECF, Live Database - flsd Page 3 of 14 Date Filed # that Docket Text 09/10/2008 1 F. 463.9 KB COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Epstein Filing fee $ 350.00. Receipt#: 544158, filed by Jane Doe No. 7.(vt) (Entered: 09/10/2008) 09/10/2008 2 r 99.1 KB Summons Issued as to Jeffrey Epstein

ng on or commenced after the date of enactment of this Act,' " "might possibly have qualified as a clear statement for retroactive effect" (quoting Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 260, 114 S.Ct. at 1494)); Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc., 511 U.S. 298, 307-08, 114 S.Ct. 1510, 1517, 128 L.Ed.2d 274 (1994) (noting

ly retroactively. Congress may prescribe the temporal reach of a statute by stating that it applies to pre-enactment conduct, the first step in the Landgraf analysis, or a statute may be silent regarding temporal reach, in which case courts apply tho judicial presumption against retroactivity. This pres

19 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION ATTACIIMENT TO CIVIL COVER SIIEET FOR: Jane Doe 1031 Jeffrey Epstein VI. RELATED PENDING CASES 08-80119 - KAM 08-80232 - KAM 08-80380 - KAM 08-80381 - KAM 08-80811 - KAM 08-80893 - KAM 08-80993 - KAM 08-80994 - K

entitled to a determination as a matter of law that the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal conduct applies. As explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,9 9 In Landgraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply

Page 19 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SIIEET FOR:. Doe 103 Jeffrey Epstein VI. RELATED PENDING CASES 08-80119 - KAM 08-80232 - KAM 08-80380 - KAM 08-80381 - KAM 08-80811 - KAM 08-80893 - KAM 08-80993 - KAM 08-80994 - K

entitled to a determination as a matter of law that the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal conduct applies. As explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,9 9 In Landaraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply