Epstein Secrets

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

me was listed among 246 unindicted coconspirators 'This opinion of the Fifth Circuit was made binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc). 8 EFTA00208098 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 0470712011 Page 9 of 1

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

t all of the pleadings in the case be sealed. Id. 'This opinion of the Fifth Circuit was made binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane). 6 EFTA00208120 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 7 of 1

ilege, even in the context of the well-established and absolute attorney- client privilege. In Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), the Court of Appeals with jurisdiction over this Court7 held that an attorney-client privilege can give way when "the client asserting the privilege is an entity which

aries of its actions with the stockholders. Id. Since that 7 See Knight v. Thompson, ---F.3d---, 2013 WL 3843803 at *5 n.5 (11th Cir. 2013) (citing Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc) (11th Circuit adopts as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prio

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

me was listed among 246 unindicted coconspirators 'This opinion of the Fifth Circuit was made binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc). 8 EFTA00212579 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 0470712011 Page 9 of 1

ilege, even in the context of the well-established and absolute attorney- client privilege. In Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), the Court of Appeals with jurisdiction over this Court held that an attorney-client privilege can give way when "the client asserting the privilege is an entity which i

aries of its actions with the stockholders. Id Since that 7 See Knight v. Thompson, ---F.3d---, 2013 WI, 3843803 at *5 n.5 (11th Cir. 2013) (citing Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane) (11th Circuit adopts as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prio