Epstein Secrets

of the amount of actual damages a plaintiff has suffered and proven. The new 3 In Landoraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. The Court determined

ant Jeffrey Epstein Date Filed: 05/01/2009 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question represented by Katherine Warthen Ezell Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami FL 33130-1780 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATT

filed by Jane Doe No. 101.(Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/01/2009) 05/01/2009 8 r 173 KB RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jane Doe No. 101. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 05/01/2009) 05/01/2009 9 ri 61.2 KB First AMENDED COMPLAINT and Demand For Jury Trial, filed by Jane Doe No. 101.(Ezell

e 6 of 7 Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Ezell, Katherine) (Entered: 06/04/2009) 06/04/2009 28 ORDER STRIKING (112 in 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM, 111 in 9:08-cv-80232- KAM, 136 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, 11

ted States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil

p-p:.i.,~.:.., 2010. Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Str

he Eleventh Circuit, In Re Wellcare Health Plans, Incorporated, 754 F.3d 1234, June of 2014. We believe that issue is relevant because they found, the Court of Appeals, that if someone was complicit in the actual offense, that they are not entitled to be a victim and can invoke no victim rights under the Victim R

9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-69 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: HMiFiner 18, 2008 2:52 PM To: KATHERINE W. EZELL Subject: RE: Emalling: C11066 Hi Kathy -- As far as I know, Judge Marra has not ever seen the agreement or these notification letters. The agreem

uct applies. As explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,9 9 In Landgraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. The Court determined

of right by a jury. Date: C44.ArtatA4-1.2)-3 , 2010. Respectfully Submitted, By: iRreat fia—Plef'-b W4P/ Robert C. Jose erg Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler St., Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Fax: (305) 358-2382 rjosefs

uct applies. As explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,9 9 In Landaraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. The Court determined

triable as of right by a jury. Date: 4artitA4-1-i-3 , 2010. Respectfully Submitted, By: ke-PO4 fe-Peet-vbv Robert (.Jose erg Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler St., Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Fax: (305) 358-2382 sefsber

duct applies. As explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,9 9 In Landaraf the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. 'Ile Court determine

ll issues triable as of right by a jury. Date: ‘44..Art.AA-r-12)-3 , 2010. Respectfully Submitted, By: R-W- C. e-pecli lay Robert r Jose e g Katherine W. Ezell Attorneys or Plaintiff Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 17 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800„ Miami, FL 33130, Miami 31:6393.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lau