Epstein Secrets

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further

e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con

to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records of the pleas of guilty . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mt Smith, the Petitioner, so that such references may not be used as a public record to impugn the reputation of Petitioner." Id. at 1107. The Court further