Epstein Secrets

ause that act is `fairly within the prosecutor's function as an advocate."' Mikko v. City of Atlanta, GA, 857 F.3d 1136, 1142 (10 Cir. 2017), citing Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259, 272-73 (1993). 3 EFTA00601684 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 4 of 11 Re

re to impeachment at trial comes well within the prosecutor's discretionary authority. In defining the contours of a prosecutor's absolute immunity. the Eleventh Circuit observed that, "IiImmunity extends to a prosecutor's 'out-of-court effort to control the presentation of a witness' testimony' because that act is

s and Mr. Cassell have very professional reasons significant personal and that they do not want the e-mails to see the light of the courtroom. See Buckley v. Am. Constitutional Law Found., Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 223, 119 S. Ct. 636, 657, 142 L. Ed. 2d 599 (1999)(4"Sunlight is said to be the best of disin

ssary . . . to prevent a client from committing a crime."). Following earlier precedent in Parrott v. Wilson, 707 F.2d 1262, 1271 (11th Cir. 1983), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the part of the district court's order determining that the crime-fraud exception may be applied because an attorney's illegal or fraudulen

ause that act is `fairly within the prosecutor's function as an advocate."' Mikko v. City of Atlanta, GA, 857 F.3d 1136, 1142 (10 Cir. 2017), citing Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259, 272-73 (1993). 3 EFTA00799966 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 4 of 11 Re

re to impeachment at trial comes well within the prosecutor's discretionary authority. In defining the contours of a prosecutor's absolute immunity. the Eleventh Circuit observed that, "IiImmunity extends to a prosecutor's 'out-of-court effort to control the presentation of a witness' testimony' because that act is