Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
9 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00792351 women who were seventee
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00181039 EFTA00181040 women wh
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00231549 women who were seventee
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
) 27 Rossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (let Dep't 1989) Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 19 19 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 7 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) 7 Correction Law § 168-a(2) 9 Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 5, 9 Correction Law §
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving EFTA00232669 women who were seventeen y
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ocument(s) 1 Source Documents) 3 Source Document(s) 1 Source Document(s) IN RE: JEFFREY J. PROSSER, Debtor. NORTH SHORE REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. JAMES P. CARROLL, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Appellee. Chapter 7, Case No. 06-30009 (JFK), Civil No. 2010-70 United States District Court for the Dist
marital homestead" is any homestead in which a husband and wife both reside during the marriage and that is owned by one or both of the spouses. 33 V.I.C. § 2305(a), (c). 3. Property § 15.30--Homestead--Divorce When the divorcing parties had lived in the marital homestead for 7 years of their 21-year
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (213)
Entities connected to both Appellant and V.I.C.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON34 w/ Appellant·52 w/ V.I.C.
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION8 w/ Appellant·57 w/ V.I.C.
George W. Bush
PERSON23 w/ Appellant·20 w/ V.I.C.
New York
LOCATION15 w/ Appellant·24 w/ V.I.C.
United States
LOCATION15 w/ Appellant·20 w/ V.I.C.
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·25 w/ V.I.C.
DI
Darren Indyke
PERSON4 w/ Appellant·25 w/ V.I.C.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON20 w/ Appellant·6 w/ V.I.C.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Appellant·11 w/ V.I.C.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Appellant·6 w/ V.I.C.
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON15 w/ Appellant·9 w/ V.I.C.
Richard Kahn
PERSON3 w/ Appellant·20 w/ V.I.C.
Woody Allen
PERSON2 w/ Appellant·19 w/ V.I.C.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Appellant·10 w/ V.I.C.
Prince Andrew
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·10 w/ V.I.C.
Prince Charles
PERSON8 w/ Appellant·10 w/ V.I.C.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·8 w/ V.I.C.
the State of New York
LOCATION5 w/ Appellant·12 w/ V.I.C.
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·8 w/ V.I.C.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON13 w/ Appellant·3 w/ V.I.C.